DO THEY USE THE PRIVILEGE UNDER ART. 136, AL. 1, Vol. 1 of the CPA THE FEES FOR THE EXECUTIVE PROCEEDINGS DUE BUT NOT PAID IN ADVANCE BY THE CLAIMER?

Current issue

Content

THE STATUTE OF LIMITATION FOR TAX OBLIGATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL CERTAINTY AND THE PROTECTION OF JUSTIFIED LEGAL EXPECTATIONS
PUNISHMENT THROUGH THE PRISM OF THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL LAW
PROTECTION OF THE LESSEE UNDER FINANCIAL LEASING IN CASE OF DEFECTIVE ITEM AND LESSOR`S INACTION

Archive

www.ciela.net

State Gazette

Newscast

Home

Author

Rumen Nekov

Annotation

The present article discusses the controversial question in the practice about the scope of the right of priority satisfaction under Art. 136, par. 1, section 1 of the Contracts and Obligations Act which is subject of interpretative case No. 2/2021 of GACCC of the SCC (the General assembly of the Civil and Commercial Chambers of the Supreme Court of Cassation).

More books from CIELA ...