Author
Annotation
This article advances the theory of the full, non-accessory nature of unlawfully dismissed worker’suit for compensation due to loss of income (art. 344, s. 1, subs. 3 Labor Code) in respect to the suit for overturning the dismissal as unlawful (art. 344, s. 1, subs. 1 Labor Code). Despite controversial nature of the proposed theory it has its grounds in the recent case-law of the Supreme Court of Cassation.
Keywords
unlawful dismissal, lawsuit for compensation for loss of income due to unlawful dismissal, full, non-accessory suit, res judicata